?

Log in

Autumn - leaves

The Churchill Factor

I was given The Churchill Factor by Boris Johnson for Christmas last year and was absolutely determined to get to it this year, preferably around the time of Rememberance Sunday and Armistice Day, which was last Wednesday of course. For once I managed to do exactly what I planned! Miracles will never cease to be...




It's funny how some books often turn out to be not what you expect... very often they don't quite live up to your expectations, which is always a bit disappointing. The Churchill Factor was that rarity, a book that 'did exactly what it said on the tin' (British advert reference for those wondering). Boris Johnson is the current mayor of London (his two-stint term ends next year and someone else will be elected to the position). Like him or loathe him (and many do both) he has a certain eccentric charm about him that I hoped would transfer to his writing. It did. In spades. The book was everything I was hoping for, ie. a sort of conversational introduction to the life and times of Winston Churchill.

This is not at all a literary tome chronicling the life of Churchill from birth to death with everything in between. It starts in 1940 when Churchill and the country are in crisis. The war is going so badly Britain is on the point of being annilated by Nazi Germany. Quite a large percentage of the House of Commons and the British public are in favour of appeasing Hitler and making a deal: 'selling out' in other words. I honestly did not know we came that close or how many people were in favour of it. In the end Churchill managed to persuade the country and Parliament to fight on but things could easily have been very different. Johnson makes the case that no other man could've have done what he did, making us fight on and having the strength and charisma to get us through WW2. Looking at other contenders as he does, it's easy to see what he means.

Basically this is a book about Winston Churchill's character. What was he like? What made him tick? 'Warts and all' is an over-used term but it's almost true here. Johnson goes into all the man's character traits, his meglomania, his charm, his work-ethic, his honesty, his eccentricities (there were many), his capacity for drinking and so on. I say 'almost' because I did slightly feel that Johnson was almost too eager to explain away some of the more questionable decisions Churchill made. The bombing of the French fleet at Mers-El-Kébir for instance, the description of that shook me a bit. That said, it was war and someone had to take these horrendous decisions, rightly or wrongly. None of us can really put ourselves into the position of a man like Churchill... in charge of taking a country through a world war and 'winning' the thing.

Reading this book it's hard not to come to the conclusion that Churchill was a bit mad. He fought in several wars and constantly put his own life at risk in a very gung-ho manner. A real 'Boy's Own Hero'. Johnson suspects he did it partly to impress his father who basically ignored him, but also because he was a huge self-publicist and loved reading about himself doing brave things in the papers! Complex isn't in it. We're all a mix of good and bad, selfish and unselfish, but Churchill is about as complicated as anyone I've ever read about.

I have say, I think Boris Johnson handles writing about this complex man very skilfully indeed. There's a lovely, amusing turn of phrase all the way through:

'Sometimes he could be Gibbonian; sometimes he was more of a funky Gibbon;'

And referring to one, Henry Labouchere, an anti-semetic who wanted to criminalise homosexual activity and who made endless allegations about Churchill's leadership, as 'an ocean-going creep'.

I wish I'd noted more quotes but I got so wrapped up in reading the book I forgot to note pages.

Churchill likewise had a brilliant sense of humour but Johnson makes the point that many of the famous Churchillian quotes we all know are sadly not true, they were made by others etc. I did love Churchill's way of signing off his letters with KBO. It stands for Keep Buggering On... so typical of men of that generation. My mother used to say, 'Keep your pecker up'. I suspect there were any number of encouraging sayings that people used during the war that we might deem a bit odd nowadays...

I could go on and on and on about this book. For me to read a non-fiction book in four days there has to be something special about it and for me it has to be its conversational tone. Johnson meanders about all over the place timewise, one minute you're in Parliament at the start of WW2, the next you're on the battlefields of WW1 and then suddenly you're hearing about Jennie, Churchill's mother. It sounds chaotic and I suppose it is a bit, but it works. I would say that this is probably not a book for your Churchill expert. I don't imagine (though I might be wrong) that they would learn anything new. But for me, with just a little knowledge of the man, it was perfect. I loved it and it's even better than that because I so wanted to like it.. and actually did. It lived up to my expectations and actually... that's a bit rare.

The Churchill Factor is my book 22 for Bev's Mount TBR 2015 challenge.

Comments

Sounds like a great book. I'm not a Churchill expert, so it's probably something I'd enjoy. What little I have read about him is in his relationship with FDR, another man who, warts and all, did great things for his country. Strange how both were rather colorful men, but I suppose that comes with the territory.
I don't think we do colourful men these days do we? And for the life of me I can't think whether that's a good thing or a bad thing. LOL! The small section about his visit to the USA to see FDR was fascinating so I hope to find more about that elsewhere.
I have several of books on FDR. One is Franklin and Winston: An Intimate Portrait of an Epic Friendship, by Jon Meacham. Unfortunately, it's also one that I haven't had the time to read. But Meacham is pretty reliable.
I'll see about getting hold of that one. I'm more interested in these more personal books than long tomes about Churchill and WW2 and so on, interesting though I'm sure they are. I've just grabbed A Daughter's Tale from the library, written by Mary Soames, one of his daughters. I shall report back on that. :-)
It does sound good. Churchill was one of my father's heroes ...or sort of a hero of his. Dad was impressed by the tempestuous times he lived through and the immense influence and political acumen he wielded. But I agree that Churchill was probably mad, because he loved war and not just because it's so profitable for the mega-rich. He liked to get in and wallow in it, from what I've heard, or at least he loved to dress up in military gear and order troops around as if they were chessmen. That's insane to me: death and destruction does not strike me as thrilling and glorious, or anything other than horrifying and piteous. Of course, any graduate of a military academy seems to be inclined that way. I think we humans must be nuts to tolerate it.
I think he craved adventure and excitement. They had one hell of a job stopping him going over for the D Day landings. He wanted to sit offshore aboard a ship to watch the action. Then the King decided to go too! They managed to dissuade him and he managed to put Churchill off but only at the very last minute. Crazy.

I think we humans must be nuts to tolerate it.

I shall be controversal and say I think we 'women' must be nuts to tolerate it. Because, let's be honest, in the main it's men who like weapons and war, not women. Though of course there are always exceptions.
"...in the main it's men who like weapons and war, not women. Though of course there are always exceptions."

Now you mention it, I remember reading that the Romans found Celtic warriors to be formidable fighters, but if a Celt had his wife fighting beside him, he was nearly invincible. There's probably more than one culture with a tradition of woman warriors, although they're far fewer than men... thank goodness!
Yes, you're quite correct and there's Boadicea and so forth. Plus, I believe there are quite a few women involved in our current crisis. I ask myself though, how many would do this kind of thing if they hadn't been heavily influenced by the men in their lives. I know it's wrong to blame all our problems on men, and I don't. But hell's bells they do make me sigh heavily at times.
This sounds right up my street so I must look out for it! I'm grateful to you for bringing these things to my attention as I don't buy newspapers any more and tend to miss out on the cultural bits! Thanks a lot.
Glad to be of service. :-)
Sounds interesting - I've always meant to read more about Churchill too, if only because I remember my mum having a set of five books by Churchill on her bookshelves, and now those same books are on mine. I always thought I should know more about him before I tried reading them.

Mind you, I'm not one of Boris Johnson's biggest fans (though I grant you he's got charisma, as you say...) - I'm guessing I'd either like it alot as you did, or else want to strangle him pretty quickly... *g*
Yes, I've always thought I ought to know more about Churchill too. One of *many* gaps in my knowledge of history. This would be a good intro to him *if* you can get past Boris. His personality is all over this book so if you're not a fan it could be a problem. I wouldn't call myself a fan really, but he has a good brain and does put things over very well in his writing. I felt like I learnt a lot and that was what I was after.